What did occur in 40% of the examined websites was a milder cookie wall, in which it was not possible to use the website properly without responding to the cookie notification. With this mild cookie wall: the cookie notification appeared in the foreground. the website itself was not (good) visible and/or not clickable. it was not possible to click away the cookie notification without accepting, refusing or adjusting cookies.
Figure 3 shows an example of the second
This often went hand in hand with using the default settings described above. In any case, the frequent use of this mild cookie. There was therefore only Cable, Pay Tv Services Email List one website that used passive consent. This website showed a small information bar at the bottom of the screen. Stating that cookies were automatically measured when using the website. This notification could be closed (so that permission was automatically granted). But there was no option to disable cookies.
Flavor 2
Fortunately, this was the only example of a cookie notification that completely contradicts current legislation. Also read: Cookies: do you choose the law or your business model? Better cookie notifications: H&M and Nespresso “How should it be?” Of course you are now wondering. As mentioned above, there were only two websites where none of the three problematic cookie practices occurred. In figure 5 you can see the cookie notification from H&M. Screenshot of the H&M website.
